pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @gregtonoski OP 3 Feb \ parent \ on: Call for nodes reconfiguration: minrelaytxfee=0.00000001 bitcoin_Mining
I think that the example proved that a "transaction paying less than minRelayTxFeerate" may be confirmed. I don't see what else may need to be proved.
Your claim is that miners are considering transactions paying less than
minTxRelayFeerate
. The transaction you showed was manually prioritized which indicates that more was paid for it. To support your claim, you should show evidence of a miner picking up transactions with sub-minimum feerates via their block template.I have explained this above already. Just rejecting my argument without showing why I’m wrong is not particularly convincing. You are either arguing in bad faith or you have a tenuous grasp of the context.
reply
I haven't claimed that miners were considering transactions paying less than minTxRelayFeerate (although they might have).
reply