reply on: Coinos exploit, check your NWC \ stacker news ~security

pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @supratic 31 Jan \ parent \ on: Coinos exploit, check your NWC security

If you want to earn sats do it outside of SN.

Is not about earning sats, it's about operating P2P

Your meme doesn't make sense.

It makes sense inside SN, just because, as you said you cannot withdraw CCs and use them out of SN.

I'm not saying there's anything wrong with CCs, they are great for newcomers and make the game much easier. It's just a matter of priority: I'd prioritize the use of sats P2P, more than use any kind of credit, anywhere, just by principles. But ok, I'll go practical and do an econ comparison to check what's worth more. As usual, economical incentive drives, I doubt, but CCs maybe cheaper to acquire than spending sats p2p. In this case, I'll change my mind... I'll verify asap

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @DarthCoin 31 Jan

we need to create a SN circular economy with CCs 😂😂😂

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @supratic 31 Jan

Yes cool, it's a nice game! But again... why @k00b and @ek still working on implementing new ways to attach wallets?

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @DarthCoin 31 Jan

I've told you: they are scared and without balls to face the reality. k00b should do this instead:

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @supratic 22h

Oh oh oh... now I got it! With stackers attaching wallets, SN not only gains on sybil fees, but also on each P2P transfer, as the SN node I presume charge fees to route payments.

I got the king assmilker!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 20h

I don't think that SN is making serious money from routing meaningless zaps.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @supratic 31 Jan

this contradicts the whole CCs thing... We are just guessing here, I'll dive into facts.

I'd also like to hear from @k00b or @ek about this. They should know what's better for SN, the use of CCs or P2P sats? or it cost the same and at this point CCs are for newbies and P2P sats for cowboys?