reply on: Sat Standard Report 001 \ stacker news ~meta

pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @DarthCoin 27 Jan \ on: Sat Standard Report 001 meta

Is a start. Still needed some other steps:

remove leaderboard and daily rewards. It doesn't make sense to zap posts with CCs and get rewards in sats.
separate upvotes (CCs) from zaps (sats).

Then you will have a real image of what is going on with SN and a real v4v system

remove leaderboard and daily rewards. It doesn't make sense to zap posts with CCs and get rewards in sats.

We can remove the leaderboard but not the rewards. I don't believe that a system can be sustainable if it's only based on tips (#770966).

separate upvotes (CCs) from zaps (sats).

SN did separate upvotes from sats when it started and it was bad

1 sat \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 27 Jan

IMHO, SN should became the new BitcoinTalk forum, not the reminiscences of r/Bitcoin reddit.

Or even better a combination of BitcoinTalk forum + BitcoinStackExchange Q&A...

All the rest is just noise.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin 27 Jan

The whole thing of "separating sats from CCs" is flawed.

I just did a test. I have in my SN account 95 CCs and a bunch of thousand of sats. I zapped 100 to a post and as designed, it was taking sats from the sats balance, not the CCs. But when I clicked on the post details it shows that received... CCs from me and not sats. THIS IS A BUG ! it should send sats not CCs.

9 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek OP 27 Jan

it is not a bug, read #841565

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 27 Jan

Then is wrong and misleading. I should be able to zap those sats until depletion not converting them into CCs.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 27 Jan

The word "sustainable" here is doing funny things!