pull down to refresh
180 sats \ 2 replies \ @SimpleStacker 12h \ on: Human Reproduction as Prisoner's Dilemma culture
Hmm, I had a hard time reading the blog post. Without trying to sound pedantic, I don't think the author really understands the game theory of the Prisoner's Dilemma. Either that, or he didn't do a good job explaining in what way marriage is like a Prisoner's Dilemma. Because Prisoner's Dilemma isn't as simple as a cooperate/defect dichotomy...
But, ignoring the technical game theory, his main point is that unilateral divorce coupled with the welfare state disfavors committed marriages. You'll get no argument from me there. But I'm not entirely convinced that this is the explanation. We said that culture is downstream from technology right? It seems equally plausible to me that the invention of the washing machine and the proliferation of online porn have made it easier than ever for men to live without partners. In any case, something is indeed changing marital and fertility norms, no argument from me there.
I had a hard time reading the blog post.
It had a kind of cyborg quality to it, ie lots of circling around a bit of insight.
I don't think the author really understands the game theory of the Prisoner's Dilemma.
I think they were just trying to be provocative. The author could've spent thought better creating a credible approximation of the payoffs.
reply
The key feature of Prisoner's Dilemma is that cooperation cannot be sustained at all without the threat of future punishment. I don't think most people think marriages are impossible to sustain without punishment.
Fwiw, marriage sounds more like a coordination game to me. Those are games where if others cooperate, you want to cooperate too, but if others defect, you want to defect too.
A healthy, balanced marriage is one in which cooperation is sustained in equilibrium by both parties, without needing any kind of future threat to sustain it.
An unhealthy couple that stays together could be one in which the relationship is only sustained through a greater future threat if either party defects.
There could also be unbalanced equilibria, in which both sides are incentivized to cooperate, but the utility is very tilted to one side of the relationship or another. In these cases, no-fault divorce laws and other such things could likely tilt the equilibrium from cooperation to defection.
reply