pull down to refresh

Which One Is Healthier? Why?
384 sats \ 10 comments \ @OT 4h HealthAndFitness
You're outside in the sun all afternoon, walking and lifting stuff. Then you have an unhealthy meal like a pizza or a burger and fries with a coke.
Or
You stay inside lying around watching TV on the couch all afternoon. Then you have a healthy home cooked meal like a steak and steamed veggies and water.
Which one is healthier and why?
Fast food / active outside22.2%
Healthy food / inactive inside77.8%
18 votes \ 20h left
write
preview
related posts
72 sats \ 1 reply \ @denlillaapan 2h
Food > activity, always.
My take is that activity can compensate for crap food—for a while and to some extent. But, to paraphrase John Tuld, it sure is hell of a lot easier to just eat well.
reply
14 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 2h
That's my take, too.
reply
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @Aardvark 2h
I pick the second one because if you only eat fast food, you're going to be very unhealthy and overweight regardless of your physical activity.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 3h
They are both pretty unhealthy. Fast food has so many additives. Being inactive causes the body a lot of harm.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @cleaningup12 4h
If forced to choose between these two, the second scenario might be slightly healthier due to the meal quality.
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @ama 4h
Mix and match? It's not necessary to always take one of the two bad decisions. Or is it?
A friend of mine always say that one needs to satisfy both the mind and the body, to which I tend to agree.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT OP 4h
Just interested to hear peoples opinions on it. I think being active outside allows one to eat unhealthy food more often as they just burn it off.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @398ja 2h
False dichotomy? 🤔😁
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @OT OP 2h
It's just for fun. Nothing too serious
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @398ja 2h
;-)
reply