reply on: AskSN now open \ stacker news ~AskSN

pull down to refresh

62 sats \ 5 replies \ @IamSINGLE 15h \ on: AskSN now open AskSN

Congratulations! I see you've increased the price this time, it's good. Let's hope we don't get flood of nonsense questions this time around.

10 sats \ 4 replies \ @Aardvark OP 15h

I'm going to be flexible on the price, 100 seems like a good starting spot. I think that there's room for having fun, and asking fun questions, but I don't want to flood the site with spam. I'm going to be trying to find a balance.

41 sats \ 3 replies \ @IamSINGLE 15h

I think 100 is a good amount, not too high and not too low. Last time it was just 21 which I think is low for people to even think before posting.

~Science has 21 too and I post there quite often but I only post either something that's latest and something that's very thought provoking, new research or discovery.

For ~AskSN, there's a problem of a proper agenda. If someone wants to ask about SN, we've ~meta, for other things, we've specific territories. However I believe, there's still scope for ~AskSN.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Aardvark OP 15h

Yea AskSN is pretty much a blanket. For that reason alone I wanted to keep it higher than certain territories. Bitcoin beginners is 75 for instance, I felt like going lower than that could potentially undercut other more specific territories. Like I said, it's subject to change.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @IamSINGLE 14h

It's a good territory, no objection and it's worth 100 sats fee, again no objection. Will definitely show up there when I'll find something to ask, irrelevant to any other territory.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Aardvark OP 14h

Thanks. I appreciate the support.