@anon
sign up
@anon
sign up
pull down to refresh
Trump mempool
mempool.space/block/000000000000000000010c05038d08c742d28a7a248e9d0f94ebe5102f366c8e
2484 sats
\
27 comments
\
@Catcher
17 Jan
bitcoin
write
preview
reply
100 sats
related posts
view all related items
396 sats
hot
recent
top
110 sats
\
3 replies
\
@count_chocula
17 Jan
no cap this is bussin, makes all other blocks sigma and has more ohio rizz than the genesis block
reply
0 sats
\
0 replies
\
@TheBTCManual
17 Jan
Bro spitting way too much blockrot
reply
0 sats
\
1 reply
\
@Catcher
OP
17 Jan
I feel like I need it to be translated from GenZ English:)
reply
0 sats
\
0 replies
\
@count_chocula
17 Jan
don't be sus, craig wright doesn't speak gen-z english
reply
76 sats
\
1 reply
\
@0xbitcoiner
17 Jan
dup
:
#853349
reply
0 sats
\
0 replies
\
@Catcher
OP
17 Jan
Oh , they didn’t post the link, that’s why it was not showing it
reply
10 sats
\
4 replies
\
@jasonb
17 Jan
I’m confused how they were able to create that portrait. I always thought that the colors changed with the size of the transaction and thus also the size of the image of the transaction.
reply
50 sats
\
3 replies
\
@Jon_Hodl
17 Jan
I believe the color is the fee rate so varying levels of fee rate changes the colors of each little block.
reply
0 sats
\
2 replies
\
@jasonb
17 Jan
Thanks! This is helpful for my everyday life too! I wish I had known this earlier. Haha
reply
150 sats
\
1 reply
\
@Jon_Hodl
17 Jan
You can experiment with Bitfeed to watch blocks get built in real time
https://bits.monospace.live/
There’s a toggle switch in the settings where you can set color based on fee rate.
I believe that MemPool space has an arrangement with Bitfeed to incorporate their colorful block display into MemPool.
reply
0 sats
\
0 replies
\
@jasonb
17 Jan
Awesome, thanks!
reply
0 sats
\
0 replies
\
@BitcoinIsTheFuture
18 Jan
History in the making. Here we go!
reply
0 sats
\
0 replies
\
@Blank
17 Jan
Hahaha, what a waste of btc.
reply
0 sats
\
0 replies
\
@SimpleStacker
17 Jan
what's with the blue dots that don't actually fit?
reply
0 sats
\
2 replies
\
@jasonb
17 Jan
Does this also mean MARA was rejecting transactions that didn’t fit in with making that?
reply
0 sats
\
1 reply
\
@Catcher
OP
17 Jan
Possibly yes, I think we will get an article about it in Bitcoin Magazine on somewhere soon
reply
0 sats
\
0 replies
\
@jasonb
17 Jan
Eh, at this point, I trust this community way more for that kind of information than Bitcoin magazine (no offense to them).
reply
0 sats
\
1 reply
\
@OT
17 Jan
Sh$tcoiners want to be remembered
reply
0 sats
\
0 replies
\
@Catcher
OP
17 Jan
Well, everyone wants to be remembered:)
reply
0 sats
\
0 replies
\
@Catcher
OP
17 Jan
I wonder if block number has any meaning for them or they just wanted to do it in any possible block
reply
0 sats
\
4 replies
\
@Catcher
OP
17 Jan
The question is - why?)
reply
0 sats
\
3 replies
\
@0xbitcoiner
17 Jan
to commemorate his upcoming inauguration
reply
0 sats
\
2 replies
\
@denlillaapan
17 Jan
shouldn't it have been
on inauguration day
in that case? (ideally, the minute the formality procedures end or whatever)
reply
0 sats
\
0 replies
\
@random_
17 Jan
maybe they're expecting a fee spike that day
reply
0 sats
\
0 replies
\
@0xbitcoiner
17 Jan
It would make more sense, but I don't think they can do it when they want to. I don't know!
reply
0 sats
\
1 reply
\
@mod
17 Jan
outlawed
stackers have outlawed this. turn on wild west mode in your /settings to see outlawed content.
dup: #853349