I'm going to jump in here and comment as I'm the author of that article.

I originally wrote that piece to warn the Bitcoin community of you and your teams generally shitty behavior at obelisk to your customers.

Your competitors were not aware of that piece until I published it as a PSA. They had no involvement in it's writing or publishing.

Some of the behavior I experienced as an obelisk customer personally from you:

A) promising compensation for delayed miners, crediting it to users accounts, and then NEVER PAYING THEM OUT B) being personally named for good reason in the subsequent lawsuit, since you yourself promised compensation in the obelisk discord at the time was coming, including honoring of coupons for future products such as hardware wallet devices https://www.classaction.org/news/class-action-filed-over-obelisks-sale-of-sc1-dcr1-cryptocurrency-miners C) generally stringing your obelisk customers along to get them to not join the lawsuit D) over promising on delivery times, which were late by months if I recall correctly

Or absolve Ken from obelisk/foundation of

D) over promising on the hashrate of the ASICs your team produced by 1/3rd!

When confronted with these facts on twitter you yourself dmed me in a rage, then blocked me. Your company twitter then blocked me. Then your staff blocked me so I can't respond to their comments saying the article was "debunked."

News flash: calling something debunked doesn't make it debunked. You have to actually provide evidence to the contrary. Which you haven't done. All I've seen you do is hand wave this sordid chapter away as a nuisance to your current enterprise. When it's very very relevant.

I encourage your customers to take a close look at you and your teams history. To verify the information in that article independent of my valid points.

You would rather have me silenced.

I would rather see you recognized for the animal you are.