reply on: Preventable Deaths And Vitamin D3 \ stacker news ~BooksAndArticles

pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 16 Jan \ parent \ on: Preventable Deaths And Vitamin D3 BooksAndArticles

I beg to differ on peer-review studies, they are mostly garbage. If the science is being done there are more experiments to either falsify or confirm the first trial. I would tend to trust that process, but peer-review — no thanks. Another thing about peer-reviewed studies is that they are all done within the paradigm, which denies anything outside of the paradigm’s boundaries. As they say, it takes a generation for the old paradigm to die along with its practitioners. I have found that some of the alternative medicines work very well for diseases like cancer, from personal experience. The allopathic doctors recommended surgery, chemo but not radiation for my wife. We went another way and fixed the problem.

20 sats \ 3 replies \ @south_korea_ln 16 Jan

As an academic, I'm obviously very much biased. And I know many are garbage. Even in my field of expertise, it takes years of practice to know which authors are trustworthy and which ones are not. And indeed, the peer-review system is very much flawed, but I'm still waiting for a better system to implement and assess the scientific method. So for now, I'll stick with those, but reading them with a very critical mind. Hence my reference to the meta-studies.

Very happy you guys found another way. Even mainstream doctors in many countries agree that intrusive medicine sometimes do more harm than good. That's why in many European countries, they won't do full-body scans (in Korea, unfortunately, we do, coz it's more money for the hospital who has to validate buying such expensive equipment). This kind of scans usually always show something unusual. And "peer-reviewed" studies have shown that, in some cases, the mere fact of detecting those weird looking stuff increased mortality rate by having people get unnecessary surgery.

Enjoyable discussion. Thank you. I need to go for a meeting and then work on my "peer-reviewed" study as well as referee someone else's paper after that, so might only read you later at night.

137 sats \ 2 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 16 Jan

My wife had a MRI scan both before and after our alternate treatments. She also had biopsies before and after the treatments. It took us 4 or 5 months to cure the problem. We did this through research on the internet and application of something called “The Dirt Cheap Protocols”. The curious thing that happened was that the allopathic doctors involved showed a markedly lack of interest in what we did. It was almost as if they knew that there were alternative methods of curing the problem. She has had no relapses or signs of return in 7 years, now. I think I have even better methods now that I have paid attention to it over those 7 years. I am very confident that if anything happens to anyone in my family, we could take care of it. This also probably indicates why none of us submitted to the inoculations that the government was trying to push onto us. I guess you could say we are ”pure bloods”.