pull down to refresh

As officials investigate what caused Los Angeles’ devasting fires, I know the answer. It was the homeless. The LA Fire Department reports that 54% of fires in 2023 were started by homeless. They responded to almost 14,000 fires that year alone related to homelessness!
Regardless of whether the Pacific Palisades fire was directly started by a homeless person, the extent of the destruction from the fire can be attributed to the homeless. A few months ago, a LA City Council person reported to me that she spends 80 percent of her time on LA’s homeless problem. Eighty percent! That does not leave much time to focus on the basic needs of the average tax paying LA resident, such as water, power, sanitation, safety, security, roads, sidewalks, traffic, parks, beaches, schools, firefighting and fire prevention. And when the mayor feels free to jet off to Ghana for a presidential inauguration on the other side of the globe, we cannot assume the other twenty percent of time is well spent.
In addition, the Council passed a budget for this year providing $1.3 Billion for homeless-related expenses. The same budget cut spending on the fire department by $17 million!
...
The LA city council consists of about two thirds’ Democrats, one third Democrat Socialists of America (DSA), and zero Republicans. It uses the homeless problem as an excuse to implement its far-left agenda, which includes rent controls, tenant eviction protections, mansion taxes, free basic income, reparations, sanctuary laws, and free housing for all.
For the City’s leaders, basic services that most Angelenos care about, like firefighting, are at the bottom of their list of priorities.
151 sats \ 1 reply \ @freetx 4h
The problem with 90% of democratic policies is that they wind up rewarding the very behaviors they claim they want to 'solve'.
Fundamentally 'homelessness' is not a problem of 'lack of a home'. But, its broken people....a combination of drug addiction, mental health issues, and lack of family/community (often because their families rejected them because drug/behavior problems).
Alternative models on how to help are springing up....there is one in Austin named Community First! - the basic idea is that homeless are provided with not just housing, but a full on community. However admission into this program requires that they follow these rules:
  • Pay rent on time every month (its a reduced rent, and they are assisted in finding jobs)
  • Obey all civil laws (no stealing, drug dealing, prostitution, etc)
  • Obey the community HOA (keep yards tidy, no loud parties, etc)
The results are pretty impressive and these models could be replicated anywhere, however many democratic cities instead take the opposite approach: Hand out needles (or directly provide alcohol in the case of San Francisco), allow them to live in squalor and filth, remove petty shoplifting laws, etc.
reply
... they claim they want to 'solve'
and clearly lefties don't want to solve any problems, and if they subscribe to the Piven-Cloward model for anarchy, they want to exacerbate the problem(s): homelessness, shoplifting, looting, arson, defund the police, defund firefighters, delinquent renters, illegal immigration, insurance fraud (both private and public), etc
If it ain't fixed, break it
edit: I forgot to add "etc" to the problems I listed
reply
I'm sorry, but I think you meant to say unhoused individuals
reply
you serious?
reply
he is being sarcastic
reply