Dormant for:
- 1+ year: 62%
- 2+ years: 53%
- 3+ years: 45%
- 5+ years: 30%
- 7+ years: 23%
- 10+ years: 17%
- 15+ years: 5%
pull down to refresh
related posts
173 sats \ 6 replies \ @fiatbad 14 Jan
I agree with @DarthCoin about this being a bad chart because if economic activity is not happening with Bitcoin, then the Creature-from-Jekyll-Island continues to dominate and rule. The more movement there is, the healthier Bitcoin is. Hodling being the dominant use-case is not I want to see happen.... and it's certainly not what Satoshi wanted to see happen. We should be USING Bitcoin.
On the other hand.... I agree that hodling is also important. We need an escape from the Creature's system. Showing that people are hodling instead of buying dollars with their Sats, even when they can get $100k for 100M of them, is a sign that Bitcoin's SoV proposition is working.
Also, 90% of the Sats I spend are done via Lightning. Those Sats will show as "not moved" in on-chain data until the channel is actually closed.... which is usually many years later.
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 14 Jan
The graph itself is fine, it's how people read into it that's the problem. The data comes straight from the timechain, it's legit! We can't sweep this under the rug.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @000w2 15 Jan
Saving bitcoin is using bitcoin.
It's transferring value to yourself in the future, as opposed to transferring the value to someone else today.
At every point in time, someone is hodling the coins, there is no magical point where the coins are "moving".
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @DarthCoin 14 Jan
sssshhh that is our secret....
nocoiner will never understand that. nor OP (the shitposter that never use properly LN).
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 14 Jan
Looks like you're the one who's confused about the chart. fiatbad had to step in to explain. The data is from timechain, it's solid!
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 14 Jan
It doesn't matter from where it is... my brain is always sharp and exclude all the bullshit
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @realBitcoinDog 14 Jan
FWIW I think your brain is sharp OP ðŸ§
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 15 Jan
This will only increase as bitcoin's purchasing power increases more transactions will move to Lighting.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 14 Jan
Great for Bitcoin, great for us! Hodlers are growing.
reply
0 sats \ 12 replies \ @DarthCoin 14 Jan
bullshit crap fiat maximalism
reply
0 sats \ 11 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 14 Jan
I'm not following your logic here. Based on the data source? The graph clearly shows the amount of Bitcoin that has been inactive over time.
reply
0 sats \ 10 replies \ @DarthCoin 14 Jan
You are following fiat maxis logic... that's the biggest error ever...
reply
0 sats \ 9 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 14 Jan
Wait, what? By showing how much Bitcoin isn't moving? I'm lost. Can you break that down for me?
reply
0 sats \ 8 replies \ @DarthCoin 14 Jan
not moving = not bitcoin circular economy. Is that simple.
If bitcoin is not moving, it is totally worthless.
If bitcoin s not moving = you are using something else, that means another fiat token.
If you are using any fiat token, that means you are a fiat maxi. POINT AND CLEAR.
If you do not understand this simple logic ... you are a fucking moron fiat maxi
reply
0 sats \ 7 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 14 Jan
Making hasty generalizations without any basis in fact. I'm leaving.
not moving = HODLE
reply
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @DarthCoin 14 Jan
reply
63 sats \ 5 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 14 Jan
view replies