pull down to refresh

Is it so far from reality? Or is it the index calculation method that doesn't make any sense?
population of at least 300,000 people 20/40/40
I think the issue likely stems from how cities are defined. For instance, most people who work in San Francisco have such long commutes that they don't live in San Francisco, so no one living in San Francisco hurts the commute metric.
If they used Metropolitan Statistical Areas, which are a more natural definition of cities, it would look a lot different.
reply