Same. It's been interesting to watch the different waves -- from indifference and hostility to a kind of midwit "I bet I can fool everyone by copying shit from ChatGPT into this email" diffusion.

It's helped me refine a belief that new tech makes fatter tails -- people who make good use of it get outsized benefits, and people who resist it, don't use it, or use it stupidly, are in worse position than they started out from.

LLMs are great for research, data extraction, language learning, designing a study plan etc. They can answer a complex question quickly, so you don't have to waste time going down a road that leads nowhere. The answer may not be accurate, but the accuracy can often be verified easily.

I find it fascinating that they can also reason as an emergent property of the way they work, even if the reasoning is different from human reasoning; based on pattern matching rather than an internal model of reality. For example they can solve math problems they never encountered in their training.

Most people don't know how to use them. LLMs sound much like a human, but need a different approach to talking to a human.

I suspect the most valuable use of AI will be as an intermediate tool rather than to produce final output. Examples of how I've productively used AI:

All the AI ads I've seen can be summarized as "Are you a real lazy piece of shit? This will make it less obvious."

It's probably a good strategy.

One day machines will have full conversations for us. Because mental effort is expensive and we should reserve that for important things like Rocket League.

"This particular piece of sequential art, which is commonly referred to as a 'comic,' possesses several qualities that contribute to its overall humor, including:

This is the case with most technology. It can be used as a tool or a toy.

🤣

Acckkktchuallyyy

Your suspicion points to a nuanced discussion about the impact of AI on human intelligence and society. Here's how AI might potentially widen or bridge the intellect gap:

Widening the Intellect Gap:

Access to AI Tools: Not everyone has equal access to advanced AI technologies. Those with more resources, like educational institutions, corporations, or individuals in wealthier countries, can leverage AI for enhancing learning, problem-solving, and innovation, thereby increasing their intellectual capabilities. Conversely, those without access might fall further behind. Usage Patterns: AI can be used in ways that either foster intellectual growth or diminish it. For instance, if AI is primarily used for entertainment or simple tasks without encouraging critical thinking or learning, it might lead to intellectual stagnation or even decline for some users. On the other hand, those who use AI to delve into complex problem-solving, research, or creative endeavors could see their intellect expand. Educational Inequality: AI in education could either equalize or exacerbate disparities. If AI educational tools are only available in certain schools or regions, or if they're not adapted to diverse learning needs, this could widen the gap. However, if implemented thoughtfully, AI could also personalize learning, helping students at various levels to progress at their own pace.

Bridging the Intellect Gap:

Democratization of Knowledge: AI can make information and learning resources more accessible, potentially leveling the playing field. Tools like AI-driven tutors or educational platforms could offer personalized learning experiences to anyone with internet access, regardless of their socio-economic status. Cognitive Enhancement: AI applications that assist in memory, problem-solving, or creativity can theoretically enhance cognitive functions across the board. If these tools become widespread and affordable, they could help narrow the intellect gap by providing cognitive support to those who might not have access to traditional educational resources. Inclusive Design: If AI systems are designed with inclusivity in mind, considering different languages, cultural contexts, and learning disabilities, they could serve as a bridge, providing tailored educational content that might otherwise be inaccessible.

Conclusion:

The impact of AI on the intellect gap largely depends on how AI is developed, distributed, and used. There's potential for both positive and negative outcomes. Policymakers, educators, and tech developers need to work towards ensuring AI's benefits are universally accessible and applied in ways that promote cognitive development for all. The key will be in fostering an environment where AI is seen as a tool for intellectual empowerment rather than just a means to simplify tasks or entertain.

I’m still not sold on AI. Seems like more hype than substance even with this graphic where is the true productivity gain?

AI for the lazy! YEAH!

Can AI wipe my ass yet?

Ranked: AI Models With the Lowest Hallucination Rates #846570

Yeah, it’s a double edged sword. Some will use AI to grow smarter, others will let it think for them and get lazier. It really depends on how people choose to use it.