He is clearly highly motivated to talk about activation methods here. He really wants to push BIP 8. I'm not sure whether I agree with Voskuil's response* (probably I don't), but at least Eric is actually addressing what Luke is really talking about in that email, and it's (mostly) not BIP 119 ...
His Tweet (and link to corresponding post on Mastodon) sharing the email list post:
My review of BIP 119 (CTV) proposal for #Bitcoin
tl;dr: I don't think CTV is ready yet (but probably close), and in any case definitely not worth reviving BIP 9 with its known flaws and vulnerability.
I was never very good with these "meta" conversations where people refer to something that happened many years ago.
Some "fresh blood" in the developer pool might actually "solve" some of the ongoing debates?
deleted by author
He is clearly highly motivated to talk about activation methods here. He really wants to push BIP 8. I'm not sure whether I agree with Voskuil's response* (probably I don't), but at least Eric is actually addressing what Luke is really talking about in that email, and it's (mostly) not BIP 119 ...
deleted by author
This is great, thanks.
deleted by author
His Tweet (and link to corresponding post on Mastodon) sharing the email list post:
view on twitter.comdeleted by author
deleted by author