[bitcoin-dev] Luke-Jr's review of BIP 119 (CTV) proposal for Bitcoinlists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-January/019776.html
226 sats \ 4 comments \ @cointastical 19 Jan 2022 bitcoin
write
preview
related posts
6 sats \ 0 replies \ @moel 20 Jan 2022
I was never very good with these "meta" conversations where people refer to something that happened many years ago.
Some "fresh blood" in the developer pool might actually "solve" some of the ongoing debates?
reply
5 sats \ 0 replies \ @0260378aef 20 Jan 2022
He is clearly highly motivated to talk about activation methods here. He really wants to push BIP 8. I'm not sure whether I agree with Voskuil's response* (probably I don't), but at least Eric is actually addressing what Luke is really talking about in that email, and it's (mostly) not BIP 119 ...
reply
2 sats \ 0 replies \ @cozy 19 Jan 2022
This is great, thanks.
reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @cointastical OP 19 Jan 2022
His Tweet (and link to corresponding post on Mastodon) sharing the email list post:
My review of BIP 119 (CTV) proposal for #Bitcoin
tl;dr: I don't think CTV is ready yet (but probably close), and in any case definitely not worth reviving BIP 9 with its known flaws and vulnerability.
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-January/019776.html
Discuss on Mastodon: https://bitcoinhackers.org/@lukedashjr/107645587796838263
reply