reply on: Why do some experienced stackers suddenly want to buy Cowboy Credits? \ stacker news ~ideasfromtheedge

pull down to refresh

157 sats \ 11 replies \ @siggy47 5 Jan \ on: Why do some experienced stackers suddenly want to buy Cowboy Credits? ideasfromtheedge

For me it's just about territory rent. SN accepts cc's for rent. If I can buy cc's less than 1:1 it's worth it. There might be other reasons I haven't thought of.

41 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bit_Alb OP 5 Jan

If I can buy cc's less than 1:1 it's worth it.

Now it makes sense. Then it's a great deal.

41 sats \ 9 replies \ @Undisciplined 5 Jan

Oh, you wanted less than 1:1. I was going to offer more than, but then I realized I don't know how to send you Cowboy Credits, anyway.

42 sats \ 2 replies \ @siggy47 5 Jan

Yes. I guess I didn't make that clear. I value sats more than dollars, so I sure as hell value them more than cowboy credits! @ek's post seems to have the ratio about right.

I think you need to detach your wallet to be sure you're sending cc's

41 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 5 Jan

I have no balance, though, so I'd then need to buy cowboy credits in order to sell them to you.

84 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 5 Jan

I made the post on a lark, just trying to make the point that cowboy credits will have value in the SN "free" market. I think that was the point of @ek' post too: #837469

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @NovaRift 5 Jan

It’s simple! disable your wallet, and anything you send will be in CCs.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @cyphercosmo 5 Jan

I believe if you do that everything you receive will also be in CCs, right? Just to confirm the understanding and clarify for others as well.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @NovaRift 5 Jan

That's right! If your wallet isn't attached, you'll only receive CCs.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 5 Jan

You don't need to detach, disable should be enough:

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @NovaRift 5 Jan

Typo 👀

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 5 Jan

If you disable your wallets, you will send CCs