@Undisciplined has created several posts (#287074, #614066, #729620) explaining that zapping bigger and more often results in higher rewards, yet almost everyone who complains that they are not receiving a lot of rewards seem to overlook the fact that they aren't spending nearly as much as the top earners. For the latest example, see #836113.
pull down to refresh
Remove the leaderboard and rewards !
For me SN will always be a "pay to post" not "post to earn" (from rewards).
If people are focused only in how much they get from daily rewards, then will not focus anymore in the quality of the content they post.
#796213
old man is always right
@Coinsreporter / @IamSINGLE know that they are fucked, the rats are drowning
Its only a matter of time before this is figured out.
Now I see why they were questioning a lot about rewards today 😂 so they're the greedy ones here who need a lot of sats.
deleted by author
😂 This can happen. But I'm glad they introduced CC's. So, I can only comment and post with my CC's. I don't think it would be a good idea to do all this hassle of scamming instead of learning or working 😂. With just $50 I could buy approx. 50000 Sats. Thanks for the warning.
Already made a meme for this:
In fact I am yelling more to the noob stackers because they are not prepared for what SN is doing...
Same
personally, I think people need to chill, I don't really understand the minutia of how it works because I haven't read the guides, I just know that I zap things I like and that SN is still the only place to make any kind of sats.
Even a measly 100 sats is still more than what I see on nostr in a month and Fountain pays out, usually, ten sats a day, so yeah.
I think this is exactly what k00b wants: people realize that when they use SN authentically, it pays.
How big is big?
The whole scoring system is relative, so "big" means big compared to other stackers.
4 -5 is big i heard from the ladies
I think timing of zapping also has to come into play. The time when most Stackers are most active happens to be my bedtime, so by the way I wake up, I feel that most threads have more or less exhausted their activity.
Anyway not whining or anything. It is what it is 😛
I see that people get greedy because of the reward you provide. 😂 You should give only CCs from the rewards too.
Right then people will get greedy fo CCs as well.
I see that people do all this for sats. With CCs, you can only spend here. You earn sats when someone pays you for your posts and comments. By the way, I don't know much about this; it's just my simple point of view.
During the replies, I received a notification about rewards. I spent approximately 250 sats and got back 265 sats, along with payments from my posts and comments. So, it's a lot more. I find it to be the best system working out there. Maybe your ranking improves when you zap more, which is to motivate the spenders so that they can keep paying this much and maintain high spirits?
You're right on most points.
The ranking improves when you zap the top content, it improves faster when you zap big.
I have no clue how the rewards pool works but maybe I should do a deep dive.
@ek or @k00b
how do I get a horse?
a gun?
I'm more interested in a gun
I am also interested in Gun and horse, but I read that it is an Easter egg we need to find on our own.
tell us once you find it
For me, SN is an excellent platform that works very well. There are certainly many who just want rewards without making any effort.
This seems valid a valid point.
#836143
Well, I get it. There should be rewards for zapping. I've no objection to this.
Edit: This seems valid and invalid point.
There was a typo.
I doubt if anyone gets it outside SN office. It's quite confusing.
The only thing I get is we first need to spend Sats to recieve them. This is clearly not the rewards are given anywhere.
In my opinion of opinions, rewards should be given to those who provide quality content daily not to those who zap more.
If you still don’t get why we have rewards (or whatever you want to call it) for zapping, I don’t have time to explain it to you, sorry
I’m being sarcastic not snarky