What stackers don't get about rewards \ stacker news ~meta

pull down to refresh

1947 sats \ 32 comments \ @ek 4 Jan meta

@Undisciplined has created several posts (#287074, #614066, #729620) explaining that zapping bigger and more often results in higher rewards, yet almost everyone who complains that they are not receiving a lot of rewards seem to overlook the fact that they aren't spending nearly as much as the top earners. For the latest example, see #836113.

view all related items

247 sats \ 1 reply \ @TheBTCManual 4 Jan

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 5 Jan

Same

187 sats \ 1 reply \ @stack_harder 4 Jan

personally, I think people need to chill, I don't really understand the minutia of how it works because I haven't read the guides, I just know that I zap things I like and that SN is still the only place to make any kind of sats.

Even a measly 100 sats is still more than what I see on nostr in a month and Fountain pays out, usually, ten sats a day, so yeah.

68 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 4 Jan

I think this is exactly what k00b wants: people realize that when they use SN authentically, it pays.

54 sats \ 0 replies \ @cryotosensei 4 Jan

I think timing of zapping also has to come into play. The time when most Stackers are most active happens to be my bedtime, so by the way I wake up, I feel that most threads have more or less exhausted their activity.

Anyway not whining or anything. It is what it is 😛

69 sats \ 2 replies \ @OT 4 Jan

How big is big?

39 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 4 Jan

The whole scoring system is relative, so "big" means big compared to other stackers.

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @gmd 4 Jan

4 -5 is big i heard from the ladies

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 4 Jan

I have no clue how the rewards pool works but maybe I should do a deep dive.

11 sats \ 3 replies \ @NovaRift 4 Jan

I see that people get greedy because of the reward you provide. 😂 You should give only CCs from the rewards too.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Coinsreporter 4 Jan

Right then people will get greedy fo CCs as well.

42 sats \ 1 reply \ @NovaRift 4 Jan

I see that people do all this for sats. With CCs, you can only spend here. You earn sats when someone pays you for your posts and comments. By the way, I don't know much about this; it's just my simple point of view. During the replies, I received a notification about rewards. I spent approximately 250 sats and got back 265 sats, along with payments from my posts and comments. So, it's a lot more. I find it to be the best system working out there. Maybe your ranking improves when you zap more, which is to motivate the spenders so that they can keep paying this much and maintain high spirits?

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 4 Jan

You're right on most points.

The ranking improves when you zap the top content, it improves faster when you zap big.

2010 sats \ 9 replies \ @DarthCoin 4 Jan

Remove the leaderboard and rewards ! For me SN will always be a "pay to post" not "post to earn" (from rewards). If people are focused only in how much they get from daily rewards, then will not focus anymore in the quality of the content they post. #796213

0 sats \ 8 replies \ @anon 4 Jan

31 sats \ 1 reply \ @OneOneSeven 4 Jan

Already made a meme for this:

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 4 Jan

In fact I am yelling more to the noob stackers because they are not prepared for what SN is doing...

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @DarthCoin 4 Jan

old man is always right

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @anon 4 Jan

@Coinsreporter / @IamSINGLE know that they are fucked, the rats are drowning

777 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 4 Jan

Its only a matter of time before this is figured out.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @NovaRift 4 Jan

Now I see why they were questioning a lot about rewards today 😂 so they're the greedy ones here who need a lot of sats.

44 sats \ 1 reply \ @anon 4 Jan

deleted by author

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @NovaRift 4 Jan

😂 This can happen. But I'm glad they introduced CC's. So, I can only comment and post with my CC's. I don't think it would be a good idea to do all this hassle of scamming instead of learning or working 😂. With just $50 I could buy approx. 50000 Sats. Thanks for the warning.

10 sats \ 2 replies \ @Bell_curve 4 Jan

@ek or @k00b

how do I get a horse?

a gun?

I'm more interested in a gun

21 sats \ 1 reply \ @NovaRift 4 Jan

I am also interested in Gun and horse, but I read that it is an Easter egg we need to find on our own.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Skipper 4 Jan

tell us once you find it

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Msd0457890 4 Jan

For me, SN is an excellent platform that works very well. There are certainly many who just want rewards without making any effort.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Coinsreporter 4 Jan

What's the use of such rewards which you'll earn only when you need to buy them?

This seems valid a valid point.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek OP 4 Jan

#836143

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 4 Jan

Well, I get it. There should be rewards for zapping. I've no objection to this.

This seems valid a valid point.

Edit: This seems valid and invalid point.

There was a typo.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @IamSINGLE 4 Jan

What stackers don't get about rewards

I doubt if anyone gets it outside SN office. It's quite confusing.

The only thing I get is we first need to spend Sats to recieve them. This is clearly not the rewards are given anywhere.

In my opinion of opinions, rewards should be given to those who provide quality content daily not to those who zap more.

77 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek OP 4 Jan

If you still don’t get why we have rewards (or whatever you want to call it) for zapping, I don’t have time to explain it to you, sorry

I’m being sarcastic not snarky