reply on: SN release: not custodians \ stacker news ~meta

pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 8 replies \ @mo 3 Jan \ on: SN release: not custodians meta

But... today, for example, everyone had zero CCs. Where all these CCs are coming from if no one bought credits?

When you zap and you or the receiver don't have wallet attached, you're sending CCs you already have, or buying CCs and sending those.

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @mo 3 Jan

you're sending CCs you already have

How? Where? My wallet had zero CCs to start with, like any other stacker I guess. And I haven't bought any (yet).

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @k00b OP 3 Jan

you stopped reading in the middle of the sentence?

... or buying CCs [with reward sats or your sending wallet] and sending those [CCs].

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @mo 3 Jan

Now I got it(maybe). So if someone zap sats to me from an attached wallet, but I haven't attached a wallet, SN keep the sats and send CCs to my wallet. Correct?

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b OP 3 Jan

Close enough

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @mo 3 Jan

Where I can find that comparison table with sats/cc/attaches-nonattached wallets you shared some time ago?

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @mo 3 Jan

@supertestnet was kind of right then #835611 🤣 No judgment, actually a nice business model

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 4 Jan

Okay thanks