pull down to refresh
I wonder why is named "p2p zaps" if most of the people are using other custodial accounts for SN zaps anyways...
Can we make wos2wos (wallet of satoshi to wallet of satoshi) a phrase? I just feel like it will look funny and break up the tension when people are having serious arguments about this stuff in the future.
so why not lead a fedimint federation on SN? private and decentralized tips with zero shitcoinery, all under your maximalist empire ⚡👑
You are getting it wrong. CCs are not shitcoins. Are simply credits to use SN. Like WoW gold. That's all.
Why to complicate things with a crap fedi when stackers can just use CCs for pay to post?
Fedi doesn't solve anything in SN case. Just complicate it more.
nah, you misunderstood my point, or I explained myself wrong, not talking about CCs as shitcoins, of course not. i'm talking about shitcoinery content in some posts here ;)
that will be the "side effect" 😂
deleted by author
You are picking holes in the tapestry.
stop.....lol
A system like SN is not meant to use this kind of "LN zap interceptor". Too much friction for so many small zaps. People have a wrong idea about "streaming sats"... But soon they will find out.
This will have an impact in:
- how many times stackers will zap. Will be less and less. You will prefer to do a single bigger zap, one time than 10 small zaps.
- the amount they will zap. Bigger zaps will be only when is really worth it, bounties, boosts etc.
The whole era of 1-2-3-10-20 sats even everything under 500-1000 sats will be over because are not worth it.
That's why I will remain a "cowboy credits" maxi and not involve any of nodes into this "p2p zaps". For me SN remain a "pay to post". So if I remain without CCs I will just deposit more sats and use them to pay to post.
deleted by author