pull down to refresh
31 sats \ 3 replies \ @petertodd 31 Dec 2024
It's just a pull-req. This doesn't necessarily mean LND will actually merge the pull-req.
reply
12 sats \ 2 replies \ @Rsync25 OP 31 Dec 2024
Yes, but he’s the main dev on the repository. I mean, one of the maintainer.
reply
11 sats \ 1 reply \ @petertodd 1 Jan
He doesn't have full control. Others have a say too.
Wait and see.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rsync25 OP 1 Jan
I know, due LND to be FOSS project and need listen others devs. Anyway, I’ll take my popcorn 🍿
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 31 Dec 2024
Def cool if true
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nout 31 Dec 2024
Well, that's very exciting!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Shugard 31 Dec 2024
Sounds cool, will be interesting to see.
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @028559d218 31 Dec 2024
How do silent payments integrate with LND?
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Rsync25 OP 31 Dec 2024
“This PR adds SEND support for Silent Payment codes to the SendCoins RPC, and, due to the way it is implemented to make this work in a remote signing setup, also to the SignPsbt call.
Features:
Add send support to lncli sendcoins, for example: lncli sendcoins --amt 5000 --addr tsp1....
Generate Silent Payment output keys when PSBT_OUT_SP_V0_INFO is present in a PSBT's output
Add ECDH shares and DLEQ proofs to PSBTs when using the walletrpc.SignPsbt RPC”
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @moel 31 Dec 2024
If I understand this correctly, a channel close will now be able to deposit coins into a Silent Payments address instead of an easily traceable address that I've already used ?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Rsync25 OP 31 Dec 2024
Yes! Instead of go to common address, you can set by default the SP address.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @028559d218 31 Dec 2024
that's cool!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @south_korea_ln 31 Dec 2024
This is cool. Another Somsen brain child going mainstream...
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nitter 31 Dec 2024 bot
https://xcancel.com/guggero/status/1874037811818750108
reply