pull down to refresh

A total of 40,079 deaths were recorded from 1999 to 2022, with cold temperatures as either an underlying or contributing cause of death, according to a research letter published Dec. 19 in JAMA Network.
The authors of the letter, affiliated with Boston’s Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, used data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to analyze death certificates.
The letter highlights a long-term trend of increase in the rate of cold-related deaths, more than doubling from 0.44 per 100,000 people in 1999 to 0.92 per 100,000 people in 2022.
Wait a sec!! Let me get this straight, more are dying from cold than before this time period?!?!?! How can that be in the age of Global Warming Climate Change”, where we are told that the ice is melting, the oceans are rising and the tropics are becoming deadly? Am I missing something here? What is happening to the paradigm?
You're helping to perpetuate a false narrative, according to Dane Wigington's most recent news report: https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/geoengineering-watch-global-alert-news-december-28-2024/#comments
You are basically helping to obfuscate the very obvious global weather control program, which is the main thing exacerbating everything. Are you aware of that?
reply
Which is the false narrative, that many more people die of cold than heat or that the climate is not really doing anything unusual, except for what geoengineering is doing? I am aware that the geoengineering is altering a whole hell of a lot of weather systems all over the globe. Witness all of the ”once-in-a-thousand-years” floods and storms going on. You also have to take into account the pure amount of volcanic eruptions around the ring of fire at this time. I don’t know if I am obfuscating anything or not at this time. I do know I dislike Be-ill Gates approach to anything he does, though.
reply
I didn't mean you were trying to obfuscate. Just that the whole "warming/cooling/climate change" argument over nomenclature is distracting to people who would otherwise care about the geoengineering thing more. Completely on the same page with you, though.
reply