Yes, you could say that. Taking the mics away, too.

Bell_curve

Yes that was the big draw of praxeology from the beginning. Although a lot of people do not like the 

 method of starting points, however you have to start the reasoning chain somewhere and this is the most solid anchor. To me, anyway, I saw a lot of the mathematical type economics come to some very unsettling conclusions. It took another way of thinking about economics to satisfy my curiosity.

Politics_And_Law

Milton Friedman Regretted Writing "The Methodology of Positive Economics"

Rothbardian_fanatic

Yes that was the big draw of praxeology from the beginning. Although a lot of people do not like the *a priori* method of starting points, however you have to start the reasoning chain somewhere and this is the most solid anchor. To me, anyway, I saw a lot of the mathematical type economics come to some very unsettling conclusions. It took another way of thinking about economics to satisfy my curiosity.