pull down to refresh

If you’re financing – that is, if you are borrowing – you also be paying for full-coverage policy that is based on the full replacement cost of the vehicle.
This is entirely reasonable – and justifiable – from the standpoint of the lender, who is in fact the actual owner of the vehicle you’re making payments on every month. (If you doubt who the actual owner is, irrespective of the name on the title, see what happens when you stop making those payments on what isn’t your vehicle until after you’ve paid off what you owe on it.)
If you wreck their vehicle, the lender would be left holding the bag. Hence the requirement – a condition of the loan and your conditional possession of what is not your vehicle in fact – irrespective of the etymological fiction – that you pay for a policy that will pay out whatever it takes to either repair the vehicle or replace it.
Yep, just another way to get you deeper into that hole you are digging for yourself with debt. You didn’t count insurance in the monthly price of the car, did you? Gotcha!!
It seems like you are having problems with other people, do you tell them based on experiences that have happened to you?
reply
I don’t seem to be having too many problems with other people. I have become much more discerning and selective over the years of experience. To say nothing of paranoid.
reply
Idk why this is in the ~conspiracy territory.
I don’t think there are many who are delusional when it comes to purchasing a car. Title, pink slip, car insurance, oil changes, registration.
There’s much more juice in the squeeze for real estate. Even if you get a mortgage, the bank immediately sells your mortgage. And the govt is helping subsidize? That’s a juicier rabbit hole.
But do you really own your Bitcoin?
reply
Yes, I do own my own bitcoin. I keep it in coldness.
reply