After Vice President Kamala Harris's defeat, Democrats are debating the electability of female candidates. Some argue that sexism played a role in her loss, while others point to campaign missteps and traditional political factors. The conversation has frustrated and foiled two generations of female candidates, with advocates arguing that if more women ran for president, their presence would become normalized and one would eventually win. However, despite two female nominees (Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris) capturing their party's nomination, the party is divided on how much gender contributed to their losses.
pull down to refresh
related posts
Bullshit premise.
exactly
No.
I think the first female President will be republican.
The delusion. Atleast they didn't blame the RUSSIANS like last time
the short answer is NO
I mean Hell No!
There have been women presidents in the history of the world who have achieved a good reputation and whose work has contributed to efficiently improve the condition of their country, perhaps in the U.S. the concept is different, however, the republican party has a lot to contribute. I am not talking about democracy or republicanism, I am talking about values, actions, and concepts, where women outnumber men by high numbers. that is why it is better than one, the ideal, according to my criteria, is that if we have a male president, his right hand and direct advisor should be a woman.
Name one example
I feel like if the right Democratic candidate were setup properly they could win but having Harris run after Biden dropped the ball didn’t really let any candidate look promising
wishful drinking