Update your rhetoric software. https://bip300cusf.com/cusf.pdf

Putting aside many of the incorrect statements such as "Then it would set a precedent for miners to lead upgrades." Which miners had all along the history of bitcoin (many updates simply don't concern node operators), there being different versons of "Bitcoin" software was always the case and is the case.

This approach is different and by design is not excludable or censorable the way ordinals were.

The block size wars were a giant waste of resources and Bitcoin is more centralized and heading towards centralization more and more:

ASICS, CEX's, compliance, centralization of Core, Centralization of LSP's (which was supposed to scale bitcoin use, they can't btw) much higher adoption of custodied wallets and on ramps.

All could have been avoided with larger or dynamic blocks.