pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 25 replies \ @justin_shocknet 20 Dec \ parent \ on: Covenant support comparison by Vortex bitcoin
Using words outside your vocabular breadth again
So literally no rebuttal at all then? Just trying to tell me I'm using the word objectively incorrectly when I'm clearly not? Do you see how clownish you look?
You literally weren't correct on a single point and have no ability to tell anyone why you think you are without using profanity.
reply
There's no point arguing with you any more than there is explaining quantum physics to a jellyfish
reply
So you can't make a legitimate rebuttal because you don't know how or because you lack the information to do so?
reply
I've explained several ways
You don't like it because you're a disingenuous and mostly illiterate bozo that believes in mythical offline L2s... hopeless case.
reply
And I've explained how you're wrong and you literally couldn't even rebuttal yet still think you're right, so I guess you are indeed a hopeless case. Best of luck spammer.
reply
Would you support a base unit increase to make self custody on-chain more accessible to mud farmers?
reply
Is this your rebuttal to me telling you LNhance is not a scam? Asking me if I would support increasing the supply cap? Of course not, supply cap will never be raised wtf are you even talking about.
reply
Still 21M whole coins
But new millisat based unit
Would solve scaling and is offline
Si or no?