pull down to refresh

Covenant support comparison by Vortex
279 sats \ 102 comments \ @btcschellingpnt 8 Dec bitcoin
Vortex recently commenced creating a wiki page that shows various developers' perspectives on the competing covenant proposals - including the projects that those developers are working on which potentially benefit/require their preferred proposal.
Great work and I look forward to watching this expand!
Not sure what it is all about? Go check out his post on nostr: https://primal.net/e/note187wvdhgxfx56s52fahm648pyhcgzjl5equk6ug4ga2n878qa4p9qavx7t5
Want to just look at the summary page: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Covenants_support
write
preview
related posts
186 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 8 Dec
Here's the relevant content from this update:
A couple of observations so far:
  • CTV has more clear technical consensus than any other op_code
  • CAT has just slightly less consensus than CTV
  • APO has the least technical consensus after CCV and PC.
  • CCV still needs alot of evaluating
Here's the post they made here: #795055
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @theonevortex 19 Dec
The table keeps improving as now there's over 15 rationales explaining their choices in detail! :)
reply
0 sats \ 99 replies \ @justin_shocknet 8 Dec
Quite the selection bias of scammers, salaried spooks, and naive shell devs.
Funny that 2 legit developers on the list offer tepid acceptance due to low fork risk for the "weak" options.... this list is backfiring beautifully for the Etheriumification camp.
reply
0 sats \ 98 replies \ @theonevortex 19 Dec
as usual justin the spammer comes to say hi, and as usual his post has 0 sats
reply
0 sats \ 97 replies \ @justin_shocknet 19 Dec
No ones buying your shitfork bro #814976
reply
0 sats \ 96 replies \ @theonevortex 19 Dec
The covenants discussion continues to heat up and make progress and that's what matters as covenants will come to bitcoin some day in some way or another, despite clueless non-dev clowns like yourself who literally aren't even capable of understanding the op code BIPs but still deciding to spam fud and nonsense everywhere.
reply
0 sats \ 95 replies \ @justin_shocknet 19 Dec
non-dev
lol
clowns
D-tier techno-illiterate influencers like you and Shinobi are really heating it up... oh and Ark scammers
Enjoy your shitfork and keep on virtue signaling, you're doing great
reply
0 sats \ 94 replies \ @theonevortex 19 Dec
keep not reading the BIPs and contributing zero technical argument against them, you're doing great...
reply
0 sats \ 93 replies \ @justin_shocknet 19 Dec
I explain things for "the average person" you're shitfork claims to help
Why don't you learn to code and implement them instead of crying?
reply
0 sats \ 92 replies \ @theonevortex 19 Dec
explain things? LOL never saw a single technical argument from you yet
I am a dev and all of LNhance's op codes are being tested on testnet right now and we should have an activation client out next year
maybe actually pay attention to what you're criticizing?
view replies