Yeah, they are making that kind of noise right now, aren’t they?
I think that they will change their thinking once Turd O is gone from the scene.
After all, he is a motherWEFer, CCP sycophant, and a feminist brown noser.

I'm not even sure Canadians would be upset if America annexed them, at this point.

Undisciplined

Yes, back to the jungle, pre-Westphalia! Why not, it would only be another 150 years of war? What could go wrong?

Israel stole the Golan Heights fair and square after the 6 day war in 1967

USA should annex part of Mexico to stop illegal immigration with land mines and a wall



Bell_curve

The actions of Israel in Golan Heights represent a perfect example of statism and imperialism. While occupying and annexing Syrian land, Israel is violating the property rights of Syrian citizens and undermining the concept of territorial sovereignty. Such an act of aggression is not only morally reprehensible but also dangerous in setting a precedent for further encroachment on neighboring territories.

Ultimately, we must stand for individual rights and property, regardless of what national border they stand on, and reject the view that a government has a valid interest in extending its territorial claim via aggression. While blindly supporting one side or the other; shutting down any criticism of our perceived “side,” we lose sight of the core tenets of libertarianism, most notably, individual rights and the right to property.

Why is everyone giving Israel a pass on this kind of behavior? If we did this to Mexico or Canada, there would be no end to the international bellyaching! Is there a class of exempt countries that can do this with impunity? I guess the 

 means that Israel can get away with this and the heinous bombing they are doing in many countries.

Politics_And_Law

> The actions of Israel in Golan Heights represent a perfect example of statism and imperialism. While occupying and annexing Syrian land, Israel is violating the property rights of Syrian citizens and undermining the concept of territorial sovereignty. Such an act of aggression is not only morally reprehensible but also dangerous in setting a precedent for further encroachment on neighboring territories.

> Ultimately, we must stand for individual rights and property, regardless of what national border they stand on, and reject the view that a government has a valid interest in extending its territorial claim via aggression. While blindly supporting one side or the other; shutting down any criticism of our perceived “side,” we lose sight of the core tenets of libertarianism, most notably, individual rights and the right to property.

Why is everyone giving Israel a pass on this kind of behavior? If we did this to Mexico or Canada, there would be no end to the international bellyaching! Is there a class of exempt countries that can do this with impunity? I guess the **New World Order** means that Israel can get away with this and the heinous bombing they are doing in many countries.