Controlling a lot of coin doesn't give them a leg up in changing anything, quite the opposite as change would be a risk to their existing business... maybe this is a warning from them that the price of Bitcoin is eternal vigilance?

It's evident that there's already a coordinated attack to increase supply:

• Use influence operations to astroturf a narrative that Bitcoin can't live up to a false/projected "original" ethos without changes
• Create a shadow governance of shady startups and NGO salaried developers that support the changes and are prepared to implement
• Flank and divide Bitcoiners over the details of said changes
• Marginalize as virtue-less any objectors who recognize there's no cause for change at all
• Shift the Overton window on unit bias by introducing a BIP to change the unit nomenclature
• Bargain that adding more base units (divisibility) is not the same as a supply increase, and is less risky than the off-chain rube goldberg systems put forward by your sockpuppet startups
• Death blow: up the base unit from 1/100M to 1/100T, setting the precedent of mutating the immutable