pull down to refresh

I think the physicality point is way overstated. People always bring up the Pistons, but the Pistons were incredibly controversial. If you watch a normal game from the 80's or 90's, it's actually going to be much less active and physical. I do wish defenders weren't penalized for being on the receiving end of contact. To me, that's why defense can be less physical at times.
The play style point feels stale to me. That was a great take eight years ago, but the top teams are actually very different from each other. It's true that most average teams play space-and-pace, tre it in or lay it in, but average teams sucked to watch in the past too.
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 12h
It is a fair point that when we think of the past we often think of the outliers rather than the average but that being said I definitely think more physicality was allowed to occur in the past. I guess it is more of an issue with the way the game is called now rather than the way it is played.
I do agree that recently we are seeing some variance in the way teams play. I think the big man and play in the paint is re-emerging but that is definitely a recent phenomenon. Hopefully it continues.
reply
Yeah 90s had some ugly games for sure. Defense dominated at times. But it did create conflicts and real rivalries. The Pistons were the bad guys and you hated them. Now who are the villains of the NBA? The “bad boys” of the league?
reply
I definitely agree that rivalries are not nearly as good as they were. I think that's because players change teams so often. They don't have a chance to go through the repeated playoff battles that build the necessary resentment.
reply
Yeah this is what I miss the most.
reply