pull down to refresh

A simple way is to use Liquid with LN with AQUA wallet. (Liquid has cryptographically secure "Confidential Transactions" so there can be no tracing / analysis).
One of the keys is to avoid transacting the same amount in/out. In other words, if you are trying to gain privacy against chain analysis of 0.238 BTC - do not put 0.238 into and then directly take 0.238 BTC out of Liquid/LN/etc since it makes it obvious what happen.
Instead put it all in, but take it out in batches (at different times).
Agreed and recommend.
reply
i have aqua, but I don't really use it much, but in this case, are you saying do my non-kyc buys and receive in liquid lightning, then flip on boltz and cold storage
but if i did 100k stats , then do like 60 swap then 40 to add privacy from chain spying?
reply
Yes, but I'm not sure you need to "flip on blotz". In Aqua there is a "swap" button that will swap between Liquid/LN and regular on chain BTC.
So you could go either way....receive via LN then swap-button back to BTC. Or reverse.... (note under the hood the "swap" button is using boltz, but point is its all integrated in a single app).
reply
Is it cheaper to just do everything in Aqua? I've been just using boltz, guess I missed the fact that it could all be done in Aqua.
reply
44 sats \ 1 reply \ @freetx 14 Dec
I think Boltz is cheaper, but depending on the amounts may not be much. I think boltz is 0.1% (1/10th of a percent) I think Aqua is 0.2% (1/5th of a percent).
So for amounts less than 1M sats probably not a big difference....however certainly if you are trying to do 10+M sats its better to do it in boltz.
reply
this is quite interesting actually, do they both use submarine swaps? or is there any difference in the way the swap is done?
reply