pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 7 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 13 Dec \ parent \ on: Coinbase is the enemy of Bitcoin - a Darthcoin warning for noobs bitcoin
If are private nodes, maybe, but not public routing nodes. is a big difference and Tor is not a solution for LN nodes.
write
preview
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @Butterfinger 13 Dec
If we build more guard nodes, tor routing LN nodes will work better. Also implementing i2p will be a plus.
reply
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 13 Dec
You don't know what are you talking about. LN and routing nodes is a nightmare, no matter how many guard nodes you put in the middle. Is about the time sync, the response time. For LN is CRUCIAL. As i said, for a private node, maybe is OK, but even then, LN already have onion routing & blinded paths so as a sender you are not revealing anything. As a receiver, I wrote this guide.
Tor for a LN node is just an added pain in the ass. Is just an illusion of privacy.
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Butterfinger 13 Dec
Ok, then don't do a routing LN node over tor. You can't stop others doing it.
reply
100 sats \ 3 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 13 Dec
Yeah but serious routing nodes will not connect with random bullshit crap Tor only nodes. So you will be isolated from big routing. I WILL NEVER CONNECT MY ROUTING NODE TO A TOR ONLY NODE. FUCK'EM. They only bring more trouble.
Read more: https://darth-coin.github.io/nodes/recommendations-ln-node-operators-en.html I know you will not read it, but I post it anyways for others to read...
You can't stop others doing it.
They are the losers not me.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Lux 13 Dec
They will say "i'm helping the network" you are doing the opposite with a routing node behind tor
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @jinformatique 14 Dec
Thank you Darthcoin, I took the time to read it and I planned to run a node only behind Tor. I didn't know, now I won't. Will Arc be easier than LN?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 14 Dec
Arc is NOT a replacement of LN.
reply