pull down to refresh

Tariffs are superfluous under conditions of domestic free trade. This is more so because the actions of domestic entrepreneurs and other market participants tend to be already adjusted to prevailing conditions of the market. Put simply, production tends to be fully adjusted to consumption demands. Barring the emergence of large maladjustments in the structure of the market in the short run, price discrepancies between the factor markets and the product markets are already in the process of being reconciled by daily actions of entrepreneurs. Under this state of affairs, the competitiveness of domestic entrepreneurs is not hampered given the absence of institutional restrictions. The more efficient producers in the domestic market are in better positions of competing in the world market. Therefore, the imposition of protective tariffs under conditions in which domestic products are competitive becomes superfluous.
Protective tariffs become “necessary” as a result of failing industrial policies in the domestic market. They are usually imposed because the industrial conditions of production in a country are unfavorable for competition; most particularly, competition with foreign products.
Yep, another affirmation that the incidents of tariffs fall on the consumer. Yes, that’s right, you will pay for these incoming tariffs. However, you asked for them, now you will get them, good and hard.
The major element people don't often associate with the tariffs vs free trade conversation are domestic economic regulations.
Freer markets are more adaptable, which makes them more able to take advantage of the efficiencies of free trade. Creative destruction runs faster. In our highly regulated economy, we get the destruction part, but the creative part takes longer.
reply
Also, any of the protected industries are also much less efficient than the unprotected ones. I just wish all the subsidies and tariffs could be cut to zero. Then cut regulations to the very core.
reply