pull down to refresh

26 sats \ 1 reply \ @aliceandthewonderland OP 8 Dec \ parent \ on: Bitcoin.org Owner Cobra Warns on Upcoming Bitcoin Soft Fork in 2025 bitcoin
Ok, I get that BIP119 can help secure self-custody in the long run.
But if we go down this route, isn’t there a risk of ending up with a similar split as the block size wars, where some nodes embrace the soft fork while others refuse, potentially leading to another contentious chain split?
write
preview
26 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 8 Dec
There is. I’m arguing for covenants, but I’m not arguing for covenants right now via UASF.
where some nodes embrace the soft fork while others refuse, potentially leading to another contentious chain split?
Not if enough miners agree (MASF like Taproot), only if there is a UASF like SegWit which is probably what you mean.
reply