The main strategy by which the state performs this type of disastrous racecraft is by conferring preferences and special rights on the races deemed to be disadvantaged or vulnerable through measures such as civil rights or affirmative action, while imposing tailored penalties on the privileged race through schemes like direct or indirect reparations. By such means, the state escalates what would merely be an ideological, philosophical, or cultural debate, into hostility, conflict, and ultimately potential violence. The entire history of a country is reduced to a toxic political dispute about racism, in which all races are expected to close ranks with their own race and fight against the other races. It is the worst form of collectivism, namely, collectivism fueled and backed by the legal system and state force……………

Based on what we know about how government schemes are created, it is likely that the federal and state authorities were not primarily concerned with the likely outcome of their interventions, but instead acted in the confident knowledge that they would be judged for their good intentions, not their disastrous outcomes. As it turned out, the outcome was more racial violence. The argument is not that there would be no violence on earth if governments were abolished, but that government interventions inevitably escalate hostilities and make the outcomes far worse than they would otherwise have been.