pull down to refresh

11 sats \ 12 replies \ @Imyourfed 7 Dec \ on: Modern science journalism is indistinguishable from trolling science
Who needs peer review when you’ve got flatulence based breakthroughs? 😂
write
preview
0 sats \ 11 replies \ @ek OP 7 Dec
This isn’t about science itself, this is about how science is communicated
reply
11 sats \ 6 replies \ @Imyourfed 7 Dec
Was just messing around lol
I get what you’re saying journalism these days has hit such a low that half the articles out there sound so ridiculous you regret even clicking them.
reply
50 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek OP 7 Dec
I just read about Schrodinger’s asshole
reply
11 sats \ 4 replies \ @Imyourfed 7 Dec
😑
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek OP 7 Dec
👀
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Imyourfed 7 Dec
😵‍💫
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek OP 7 Dec
😱
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Imyourfed 7 Dec
😫
reply on another page
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Bell_curve 7 Dec
Use Reddit and X
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Imyourfed 7 Dec
Why though?
reply
11 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bell_curve 7 Dec
Since journalism today is a joke
Too many incompetent and unqualified journalists today
For science topics you get more feedback on social media
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @Imyourfed 7 Dec
Makes sense! Thank you
reply