Yea, the dude said he's bought "music using dollars". And then in later sentence he mentioned concert. 

So that's what I was replying to. 

Concerts are scarce economic goods (well, services). No argument there. But that's not what I'm talking about 

Do I need to read the article to point out that replying with

> yes, it's called donations

to

> I’ve gone to concerts and paid using dollars

doesn't make sense? But I see, I think you only wanted to reply to the first part:

> I bought music using dollars

I still don't agree with you but it at least makes more sense now

I explicitly use the concert example in the article. You're welcome to read it, sir.

A concert, unlike infinitely replicable digital files, has plenty of scarcity -- which is why Taylor etc can charge tons for them.

BooksAndArticles

Music Has No Economic Value; Convince Me Otherwise (TDE, Joakim Book)

denlillaapan

I explicitly use the concert example in the article. You're welcome to read it, sir. 

A concert, unlike infinitely replicable digital files, has plenty of scarcity -- which is why Taylor etc can charge tons for them. 