pull down to refresh

The federal government has grown much faster than federal employment because most of the people paid to do things by the federal government are not actual federal employees. Most federally funded workers are now contractors and grant-funded workers. This doesn’t even count the legions of state and local government employees whose jobs are partially funded by federal transfer payments to the states and locals.
Like so much of what’s coming out of the Trump administration, this talk about federal employment is mostly theater. This is demonstrated in how DOGE spokesmen tell us how hard it will be to fire federal employees with civil service protections. That is, the DOGE people are already explaining to us why they won’t be able to cut federal employment—probably so they have an excuse for why so little of the federal work force will actually go away over the next four years.
If Trump’s people have any interest in actually cutting the number of people who work for the federal government, they can simply start with cutting the millions of federal contract and grant workers who actually outnumber the total number of federal employees. Without federal contracts and federal grants, those employees go away. Wringing our hands about how many civil service workers there are is mostly a distraction when the real problem is federal spending.
The spending has been the problem from the start. If they weren’t spending like drunken sailors, we wouldn’t have deficits. Jackson knew this and did what was required to pay the federal debt off. We could do it too, if we had the will to cut back on the money the federal government gives out like confetti. Of course, we, the people, have found out we can vote ourselves money out of the treasury to no end. That is also part of the problem. We must also get all of those “contract workers” cut out of the budget.
The problem with cutting spending is that it requires congressional action. At best, I could imagine congress holding spending flat.
The president needs to cut everything that has not been specifically required by congress or the constitution. Everything else is at the discretion of the president.
They really need to take advantage of the looming government shutdown. While things are closed down, they might be able to take some action.
reply
I don’t think any of the current crop of wastrel politicians has the stomach for shutting down the state! With a shutdown the new administration could make a lot of huge changes. However, with the current RINOs and commies, I don’t think they will allow a shutdown. “The Turtle” is still controlling the Senate and Johnson does not seem to have any cahones. The spineless Republicans seem to back down at any opportunity.
reply
This DOGE is a joke. Putting elon musk in front of it when he couldnt make twitter profitable makes me laugh.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @kepford 5 Dec
It is a joke but not for that reason.
reply
For which reason is it a joke, then?
reply
I think if you're insulting the richest man on the planets ability to make money, you probably aren't being objective.
reply
I think @Satosora was saying that Musk has better things to do with his time as an entrepreneur than become a bureaucrat.
reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @Satosora 5 Dec
He is just going to be chasing his own tail. He doesnt belong in politics.
reply
I don’t disagree with that. I think his marginal value in politics is less than his marginal value as an entrepreneur. He seems to be able to do very well in business, which is a different skill than bureaucracy.
reply
Apparently, Musk seems to be able to handle his time very well. I would say he is probably an excellent delegator of tasks to underlings. He can delegate to the proper person and walk away, knowing they will do the job he wants. BTW, DOGE may not be as effective as we think because he can only cut what the Article III says is in his area. He will have no authority to cut in Article I and Article II areas.
reply