pull down to refresh
48 sats \ 0 replies \ @jk_14 4 Dec
Big discussion here (and most natural fix):
#291420
And yes, a free market between active and passive Bitcoin users is moral choice, and that's why it's more important than "stupid 21M meme" (copyright by Peter Todd ;)
"It makes sense. Something akin to what the central banks do by setting interest rates, but algorithmic, leading to a 'natural' (rather than manipulated) level of inflation"
P.S.
"If we would have four years long network difficulty regression - then it's emergency, and new code handling such danger - should delay halving to the next halving, until difficulty will recover"
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 4 Dec
I lived through the crashes of 98 and 2000 and made tons of money using both options and shorts on .com companies. I made the most on the crashing Cisco prices.
You can borrow and lend BTC as banksters do without f*cking up the interest rate by two simple methods: 1. No reserve ratio, if you have one you can lend one — you cannot lend out what you do not have! 2. Use the pure time preferences of the owners of the BTC. If they say the interest rate for a year is 50% that is what you have to give them, or not borrow. This will equilibrate the supply and demand of the BTC to borrow and lend.
reply