pull down to refresh

11 sats \ 2 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 2 Dec \ on: People Will Share Misinformation That Sparks “Moral Outrage” science
Yes, who was determining what misinformation, disinformation and malinformation is? It is important to understand how the experiment is constructed and what the actual treatment was. It could be that the treatment was not one of the infamous three to the people disseminating it. Would this experiment mean anything if that were so? Also, have the results been duplicated or is this just another pile of hot steamy BS?
write
preview
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner OP 2 Dec
I don't know how to answer your questions. The full article is here, but I think you have to pay. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adl2829
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 3 Dec
I read what was there for your citation at the top. I don’t care to pay for articles. If they haven’t duplicated the results following the same protocol, then this means nothing, or maybe just hot air and hype. Especially in the social sciences, non-duplication and bogus research is rife. Then there are the problems with peer review that are myriad. Trusting the ScienceTM is just beyond the pale, right now.
reply