The speaker explains their current perspective on Bitcoin upgrades, particularly CheckTemplateVerify (CTV). They feel uneasy about their position, acknowledging that it may not fully align with objective truth but remain unsure where their reasoning falls short. The core points include:

Bitcoin upgrades, such as CTV, are polarizing. The speaker explores the broader implications, including governance, user trust, and technical impact, rather than focusing solely on technical details.

CTV, which allows users to set conditions on spending Bitcoin, is seen as relatively innocuous, akin to previous features like CheckLockTimeVerify and multisig. The speaker argues that it could improve scalability and security (e.g., vaults for enhanced theft resistance) without introducing major risks.

The speaker highlights a divide between:

The latter group believes Bitcoin's stagnancy undermines its resilience.

The speaker critiques Bitcoin Core for being slow and politically averse to implementing even widely agreed-upon features.

Skepticism exists toward proponents of certain upgrades who may prioritize personal agendas over Bitcoin’s best interests.

While acknowledging the potential for unintended side effects, the speaker argues that CTV's limited scope makes such risks minimal.

Beyond CTV itself, the debate symbolizes larger issues in Bitcoin's governance and decentralization. The speaker suggests that activating CTV without Bitcoin Core could demonstrate the community's ability to circumvent bottlenecks in development.

The speaker encourages informed debate, transparency, and collaboration to ensure decisions align with Bitcoin’s principles and long-term viability.

While cautiously supporting CTV as a beneficial upgrade, the speaker emphasizes its symbolic role in addressing Bitcoin’s stagnancy and governance inefficiencies. They invite counterarguments to refine their stance and guide the community’s next steps.