reply on: How Bitcoin Scales w/o Forks: the Lightning, Liquid, On-Chain Triangle \ stacker news ~bitcoin

pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @iguano 2 Dec \ parent \ on: How Bitcoin Scales w/o Forks: the Lightning, Liquid, On-Chain Triangle bitcoin

100% sure you didn't read the article.

20 sats \ 5 replies \ @DarthCoin 2 Dec

I read it entirely and also I played out with the wallet. I know very well what am I talking about.

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @iguano 2 Dec

so you clearly not understood the article. read it again.

121 sats \ 3 replies \ @DarthCoin 2 Dec

No need. Is just a pathetic marketing for Liquid crap.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @iguano 2 Dec

if you READ the article, you will see the disclaimers about liquid, so I'm 100% sure you didn't read it. is VERY WELL specified there also the goal and the purpose of using it. The people who comment without reading lose credibility.

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @028559d218 OP 2 Dec

You are right. The point is not to 'use liquid'... Liquid is just a temporary tool in order to 'stack sats' and manage lightning Liquidity among people who don't have the initial 300-500k sats to open a lightning channel (much of the world).

I posted this elsewhere... that once BTCPay has a 'Boltz Lightning-Liquid' extension available it will be everywhere. It allows people to accept 'non-custodial' lightning without having the initial lightning node.

1 sat \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 2 Dec

I do not need you to offer me "credibility". Is just common sense to see that the article is pushing a crap narrative.