pull down to refresh

31 sats \ 4 replies \ @iguano 2 Dec
Don't you think that this is getting dangerous for the whole ecosystem?
reply
If it's dangerous bitcoin is done.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ca 2 Dec
Yep, and this guy is not even in it for the FreedomGoUp Tech...
Might be the most damaging bitcoin Influencer. Why did we make him an icon?
reply
Sounds like you should be stacking harder
reply
:D ok boss
reply
42 sats \ 0 replies \ @joda 2 Dec
Only 17969 to go
reply
25 sats \ 0 replies \ @freetx 2 Dec
accretion > dilution
reply
25 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 2 Dec
They're eventually going to get a million aren't they...
reply
Make Bitcoin Unaffordable to Saylor
The will only end up going one way… I’m just not sure which way. Really good or really bad… NO in between. Similar to Bitcoin it self
reply
Looks like they can now sell even more paper bitcoin.
reply
How can we know for sure they are really holding and buying all of that?
reply
Will there come a point in time in which MicroStrategy holds so much BTC that its decentralisation is compromised?
reply
83 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 2 Dec
I don't think so.
MicroStrategy doesn't hold bitcoins of other people like ETFs so in case of a hard fork, they don't vote for other people which chain they are going to follow.
reply
You are so active these days!
Thanks for the quick input
reply
They will own lot of BTC, not 51% of miners. Talking about (de)centralization does not make sense.
reply
Holding more coins does not give someone more control over the network.
reply
Right, also MSTR do not own any BTC, they have only IOUs.
reply
Thanks for correcting my misconception
reply
Imagine buying up $BTC with other people's fiat.