Custodial solutions, from what I can tell, in the United States that are non-kyc are going away. Unless the next administration employs major changes, they will not be allowed to operate openly in the United States.

028559d218

Well, there is no "solution" to L1 scaling. Its a fundamental constraint.

There needs to be an L2 for scaling....whether thats LN, Ark, Liquid, etc. They each have various functionality and security trade-offs.

The negative of Liquid is that it relies on a federation to provide security/transactions. However, for that con, it offers several pros, like Confidential Transactions and a more expressive OPCODE set (including OP_CAT for covenant support)

Personally I trust Liquid more than a fully custodial solution like WoS or other "hosted LN wallets".

bitcoin

How Bitcoin Scales w/o Forks: the Lightning, Liquid, On-Chain Triangle

Well, there is no "solution" to L1 scaling. Its a fundamental constraint. 

There needs to be an L2 for scaling....whether thats LN, Ark, Liquid, etc. They each have various functionality and security trade-offs. 

The negative of Liquid is that it relies on a federation to provide security/transactions. However, for that con, it offers several pros, like Confidential Transactions and a more expressive OPCODE set (including OP_CAT for covenant support)

Personally I trust Liquid more than a fully custodial solution like WoS or other "hosted LN wallets". 
