pull down to refresh

Over the past 50 years, the leading pharmaceutical companies in the United States have caused the injuries and deaths of millions of Americans. This troubling reality has reached such widespread acknowledgment that iatrogenic harm—injuries and deaths caused by medical treatment and erroneous diagnoses—now ranks as the third leading cause of death. There is growing consensus that our federal health agencies, which are meant to protect public health, have failed to address this crisis in any meaningful way. In fact, these agencies have often undermined efforts to confront the serious flaws in our healthcare system and in fact enable systemic corruption to thrive within the industry.
Studies over the years have consistently placed iatrogenic deaths as one of the leading causes of mortality with some analyses labeling it the third leading cause of death after heart disease and cancer. However, there is increasing evidence that the actual numbers may be significantly higher than what current estimates suggest, revealing a deep and pervasive crisis within the healthcare system.
What other result could we have expected, once we gave them immunity from tort claims and they started to declare their drugs safe with their own research to the FDA (along with the fees paid)? Advertising is also a contributing factor in the Pfizer story. Didn’t anyone think all this would be detrimental?
Americans live in a Biomedical Tyranny. Health care costs are the #1 source of bankruptcy. The AMA holds monopoly power over the labor market for doctors and thus the ability to make medical decisions. The Pharma companies run Washington and have protected themselves from tort claims while marketing dozens of drugs at greater cost than what is medically necessary. And yet, Americans have a high degree of trust in doctors and the medical profession. When will this change?
reply
The “Biomedical Tyranny” that you talk about has come about thanks to the Rockefellers’ project by the AMA and the Flexner report. It was a plot to monopolize the medical professions by “modern” doctors. They cut out the other kinds of medicines by not licensing those types of doctors, thus, decreasing the competition. The now licensed doctors could demand more money for their services due to their monopoly position. This is where the problem lies, not allowing other types of doctors to be licensed, for instance herbal medicine doctors and homeopathy doctors and etc.
reply
Not to mention, they have made it so expensive and difficult to become a doctor. I have met so many bright, talented college students who I have no doubt would have made fine doctors, give up on that dream because of the difficulty and costs associated with it.
reply
Yes, and many of the ones that are able to enter the colleges are family members of doctors, you know, kids and such. Cronyism at its best, but perhaps better than DIE. They are taking in DIE candidates that are not qualified at all to become your doctors. NO THANK YOU, VERY MUCH!
reply