pull down to refresh

The other day, I gave some sats to a stacker who said they were homeless and starving: #786504
As my first post indicated, I had some suspicions, but in praying about the matter, the Lord directed me to give the sats to the person as they asked.
I did so, and it appears the person outed themselves as some kind of fraudster.
The question becomes, however, had I not done as I was told whether or not that would have happened? Notice some of the other responses on there about it "being some kind of lesson for me". I mentioned that the lesson was not for me. This is the lesson.
If a person claims to be serving God, then they cannot also serve their wallet because there are bad financial moves that one might be asked to do on behalf of spirit. These are matters of faith and not business. If a person on Thanksgiving says they are starving and homeless and the spirit moves you to assist that person, EVEN IF THEY ARE A FRAUD, it becomes your spiritual duty to do so.
Why? Because as I mentioned in the post, the sats were not mine, they were Gods and I just happened to be holding on to them at that point in time. Within approximately two days, all my sats that had taken six months to glean before are nearly replenished to where they started before I donated to the person in question. Why? Because I wasn't paying for the content, God was.
But let us assume that God had not refilled my wallet. Would it be any less of a testimony? No. Sometimes it takes quite awhile before a person sees any fruit from the actions they are taking. You notice one person on that thread goes so far as to state they are not going to give me any sats because next time around I won't be so trusting and naive. If it was the case that God was pushing on their heart to be a part of the solution and they refused to do so because they felt they understood my motives, then the person has not stolen anything from me, but they have stolen from God.
God will simply find some other way to accomplish what He has in store for me. On the other hand, there is a good chance that the "thieves" will be defrauded in one way or another.
Financial glory goes to God for a testimony, along with any other mortal kinds of glory. In a very real sense "I" never pay for anything. The Messiah paid for the ultimate price, and God sent Him as a kind of loan reconciliation to atone for sin. What else is there for me to pay for then? Everything is paid. I simply have to conduct myself such that the conditions of the atonement apply.
If people want or expect Bitcoin to change the world, and they think it is some kind of "Jesus money" they are first going to have to learn who pays the bills and who owns the bank. No other money revolution is going to make up for human deficiency and greed. The community here was done a service which I happened to participate within. The thanks goes to God as it was He who directed my course. Perhaps He wanted the corruption rooted out, or perhaps He wanted a testimony such as this and knew that the course of events would produce it.
Either way, all the good produced from the action was His idea. I just happened to be holding the resources and asked.
Most beggars have some problem or other. Its not a position most of us would want to be in. I struggle though with giving to beggars as I worry it will only encourage them- but maybe this is wrong and I should give and thereby show them some love which ultimately is what many of them lack?
reply
There is definitely a balance.
reply
Yes its a balance I find difficult to maintain sometimes. Recently been traveling and seeing a lot of homeless beggars and its confronting...as my relative wealth feels uncomfortable.
reply
I also think you did right. Of course, if we know a person will use a gift for evil purposes or if we have reason to suspect bad faith, no one is obliged to give anything. Sometimes it might be the contrary. But I hardly think one can be at fault for taking something at face value. We’re educated and conditioned from our earliest years to think that what happens to others is of no consequence to us and that the things we have are all due to our own merits and that we can use them without any thought to the Laws of God
reply
I hear what you are saying, but I think the Bible is full of examples of taking things at face value only and how that can be dangerous.
reply
I know. I’m arguing for your position. Assuming honesty should be our default. That doesn’t mean we should be naive and help people without discernment, however.
reply
Ah I read that differently. I thought you were saying that people could not be faulted for taking things at face value in the sense of not doing the spiritual aspect.
reply
You did the right thing either way. We can't be concerned with what happens after we give. I believe that when we give unconditionally, it comes back to us no matter the circumstances. We can't see the bigger picture directly sometimes. Thank you for sharing this story.
reply
I believe this as well. God will judge!
reply
Yes, the Buddhists call it "right action" with no expectation of "outcome". I think that's a fit description.
You are welcome!
reply
21 sats \ 3 replies \ @anna 3 Dec
It’s really nice to read this, thanks for sharing. I give money to people begging and I am sure I have been scammed from time to time. Friends have judged me for doing so. But I believe it is more important to help even one person truly in need than what the money I have given is worth. It is not up to me to cast judgements on what is done with that money after it leaves my hands
reply
You can't be scammed when giving unconditionally. 💚
reply
The condition is the person asking has to be able to receive.
reply
Precisely. It is not the fault of the giver if the asker is a thief.
reply
Heb 11:6 KJV But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
Shared using AndBible: Bible Study. (https://andbible.github.io)
reply