pull down to refresh

Interesting question.
Inflation under a hard-money standard (e.g., gold or silver-based monetary systems) generally exhibited very different characteristics compared to modern fiat systems:
  1. Stable Prices Over the Long Term Prices under hard-money systems tended to remain stable or even decline over long periods due to productivity growth outpacing the supply of money. Example: During the 19th century under the classical gold standard, the purchasing power of money increased in many countries as industrialization and technological advancements lowered production costs.
  2. Short-Term Volatility While long-term inflation was negligible, short-term price fluctuations were common, often driven by:
  • Economic shocks (e.g., wars or crop failures).
  • Gold/silver discoveries (e.g., the California Gold Rush in the mid-1800s increased the money supply, temporarily causing inflation).
  1. Deflationary Tendencies Because the money supply was constrained by the availability of gold/silver, economies sometimes experienced deflation (falling prices) when demand for money grew faster than its supply. This was common during periods of rapid economic expansion or financial crises.
  2. Regional Variations Inflation or deflation was influenced by the local supply of and demand for gold and silver. Regions with gold/silver mines or higher trade surpluses could experience localized inflation.
  3. Impact on Wages Wages adjusted more slowly than prices, leading to periods of economic hardship during deflationary episodes, especially for debtors whose debts became harder to repay in "harder" money.
Historical Examples: A. Gold Rush Inflation (1848–1855): The influx of gold caused a temporary increase in money supply and inflation. B. Deflation in the Late 19th Century (1873–1896): Known as the "Long Depression," many economies experienced deflation due to rapid industrialization and limited monetary expansion under the gold standard.
Inflation on a hard-money standard was typically minimal or even negative over the long term, with periods of short-term volatility. While this system ensured monetary stability and trust, it could also cause economic rigidity, making it difficult to respond to crises or accommodate rapid growth. This contrasts sharply with the fiat systems of today, where inflation is often persistent and centrally managed.
Further reading:
a) Historical Studies "Prices and Wages in England" by Arthur Gayer, W. W. Rostow, and Anna Jacobson Schwartz. A detailed study of price levels and wage changes during the gold and silver standards.
"The Gold Standard in Theory and History" edited by Barry Eichengreen and Marc Flandreau. Discusses the operation and economic effects of the gold standard, including inflation and deflationary episodes.
b) Research Papers "The Gold Standard as a Rule" by Michael D. Bordo (NBER). Examines the historical gold standard and its role in stabilizing inflation and economic growth.
"The Deflation of the Late 19th Century" by Hugh Rockoff. Focuses on the period of deflation during the classical gold standard era and its implications.
"Commodity Money Inflation: A Lesson from American History" by Peter L. Rousseau. Explores periods of inflation and deflation in the U.S. under hard-money and fiat systems.
doesn't seem to bad at all, wages still increase at a shit pace and fiat hyper inflation has decimated so many counties
reply