pull down to refresh

50 sats \ 5 replies \ @Satosora 21 Nov \ on: Evil? Maybe. Crazy? Don't Bet On It. BooksAndArticles
"Viewing the West’s efforts to make Ukraine a bulwark on Russia’s border as an existential threat that could not be allowed to stand." This shows that they did some deep thinking before actually going to war. Its just that they werent able to deliver the killing blow quick enough.
write
preview
20 sats \ 4 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 21 Nov
Who, the Russians or NATO OTAN?
reply
20 sats \ 3 replies \ @Satosora 21 Nov
The Russians. Not that I agree with this war, but if they had been able to deliver the killing blow before others had gotten involved, they would have gotten Ukraine already.
reply
20 sats \ 2 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 21 Nov
But, they said they were not interested in conquering Ukraine, they only wanted to protect their fellow Russian-speaking brothers and sisters from the Ukrainian Nazi bombardment they were receiving. Who would want to conquer such a corrupt place and try to rule it? Think of who is profiting from this war, is it the Russians, the Ukrainians or someone else?
reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @Satosora 21 Nov
Everyone that joined to help Ukraine wants a piece of Russia. Russia has a lot of resources.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 22 Nov
Yes, they want to dismantle both Ukraine and Russia. They both have resources in abundance. Already a chunk of Ukraine has been bought out by Blackrock, et. Al. This is exactly what they are looking for. They are taking it away because of loan provisions.
reply