Sad to see Austin in this one. I guess no one is sending one nuke if they're going to send nukes?
pull down to refresh
235 sats \ 7 replies \ @Undisciplined 19h
Have you ever looked into the fallout simulators? (not to be confused with the Fallout franchise)
reply
27 sats \ 6 replies \ @k00b OP 19h
No but now might be a good time to.
reply
47 sats \ 4 replies \ @plebpoet 17h
wait what's special about now?
reply
15 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined 16h
Russia has expressed their right to use nuclear weapons if a nuclear armed power takes a more active role on Ukraine's side of the conflict.
reply
54 sats \ 2 replies \ @j7hB75 16h
Putin has been saber-rattling this stance since Russia invaded Ukraine which happens to be 1,000 days ago.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 16h
I know, but every time there's a new mention of nukes people's ears perk up.
reply
215 sats \ 0 replies \ @j7hB75 16h
True.
My ears perk up as well because it's nothing to scoff at. I try to ignore it but will occasionally become too entrenched with the idea of nuclear war.
I'll go down a rabbit hole and get sucked into the prepper mindset, watch movies like The Day After and Threads, and ultimately become too anxious and paranoid in day to day life.
I try not to worry about it anymore because it's something that I can't control. Not to dox myself, but I live by a target that will most likely be one of the first hit and I'm at peace with dying.
See, I'm already starting to get sucked back into this paranoia. Haha. Damnit @k00b. :-)
reply
14 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 19h
They take account of things like prevailing wind patterns and blast radius. I doubt we're actually very near to that, but it's better to be aware than not.
reply
179 sats \ 4 replies \ @Aardvark 18h
I don't think it matters where you are if the nukes start flying.
reply
159 sats \ 2 replies \ @TheWildHustle 18h
Might be better to be hit straight on
reply
35 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 17h
and be the first city to get hit
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheWildHustle 17h
Take it on the chest. Jump into the thing, screaming something about freedom or whatnot.
reply
12 sats \ 0 replies \ @justin_shocknet 17h
Probably why underground bunkers and nuclear powered submarines fetch a premium
reply
15 sats \ 0 replies \ @jddska 9h
I think its power is very overestimated, nukes cannot destroy taht much and be used in that number. Now they are more powerfull than hiroshima and nagasaki times, but search for some documentaries of people that survived both, some of them were like 2-3km away and nothing happened to them, imedialitely or long time because of radiation. States always try to figure it as total and complete destruction and that after it there's killer radiation everywhere.
reply
14 sats \ 0 replies \ @jddska 9h
What would be the targets in Europe? I saw some map of countries targeted by Russia, but would like to see cities and military basis, as the USA the colonizer of Europe has many bases there.
reply
31 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 10h
Map Unveils Safest Locations in the US for Surviving a Nuclear Apocalypse
https://historyenhanced.com/map-unveils-safest-locations-in-the-us-for-surviving-a-nuclear-apocalypse/
reply
18 sats \ 1 reply \ @cascdr 16h
@k00b is Nick posting.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 15h
Nick is contagious.
reply
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @JesseJames 16h
No one will be using nukes anytime soon, get over this, this is a suicide and they all know it. They rattle (or attempt to) some cages just to be heard. The world is over if even half of this is remotely true. Period.
Ain't happening.... IMHO.
reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 17h
What about Alaska and Hawaii?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 15h
I suspect they're fucked like everything else.
reply
14 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 16h
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @Cje95 15h
I’m just sayin if they start firing them I will be happy to be in DC cause imma be vaporized ASAP and won’t have to deal with any uncertainty or drama 🤷🏼♂️
reply
19 sats \ 0 replies \ @7e6e393a56 18h
Unfortunately, the reality is that countries that have nuclear power have more autonomy in their decisions and are unlikely to be directly harassed... we have an example of this happening today with Russia
reply
35 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 16h
reply
64 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coyote_Cosmico 12h
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 16h
Isn’t it rich? The only sane one in this whole matter appears to be NOT our man, Vlad Putin!!! While the NATO creeps just cannot keep from swinging their dicks around at everybody else! When did dementia, insanity and psychopathy become the standard for leaders in the West?
Can’t wait to see something different. Pulling out of NATO and the UN would be great.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Thwachi 10h
Nice post
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @BlokchainB 13h
Ahh yes South Dakota!! Spared! Shocked to see Montana and North Dakota get hammered
reply
200 sats \ 0 replies \ @Enemy_of_the_state 13h
Lots of missiles in NoDak and Montana, since they are closest to most targets in Russia. That’s why they are targets.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satoshi__Nakamoto 16h
Seems really bad lots of nuce
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nitter 19h bot
https://xcancel.com/Rainmaker1973/status/1859199980264710247
reply