Sad to see Austin in this one. I guess no one is sending one nuke if they're going to send nukes?
pull down to refresh
31 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 1h
Map Unveils Safest Locations in the US for Surviving a Nuclear Apocalypse
https://historyenhanced.com/map-unveils-safest-locations-in-the-us-for-surviving-a-nuclear-apocalypse/
reply
235 sats \ 7 replies \ @Undisciplined 10h
Have you ever looked into the fallout simulators? (not to be confused with the Fallout franchise)
reply
27 sats \ 6 replies \ @k00b OP 10h
No but now might be a good time to.
reply
47 sats \ 4 replies \ @plebpoet 8h
wait what's special about now?
reply
15 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined 7h
Russia has expressed their right to use nuclear weapons if a nuclear armed power takes a more active role on Ukraine's side of the conflict.
reply
54 sats \ 2 replies \ @j7hB75 7h
Putin has been saber-rattling this stance since Russia invaded Ukraine which happens to be 1,000 days ago.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 7h
I know, but every time there's a new mention of nukes people's ears perk up.
reply
215 sats \ 0 replies \ @j7hB75 7h
True.
My ears perk up as well because it's nothing to scoff at. I try to ignore it but will occasionally become too entrenched with the idea of nuclear war.
I'll go down a rabbit hole and get sucked into the prepper mindset, watch movies like The Day After and Threads, and ultimately become too anxious and paranoid in day to day life.
I try not to worry about it anymore because it's something that I can't control. Not to dox myself, but I live by a target that will most likely be one of the first hit and I'm at peace with dying.
See, I'm already starting to get sucked back into this paranoia. Haha. Damnit @k00b. :-)
reply
14 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 10h
They take account of things like prevailing wind patterns and blast radius. I doubt we're actually very near to that, but it's better to be aware than not.
reply
179 sats \ 4 replies \ @Aardvark 9h
I don't think it matters where you are if the nukes start flying.
reply
159 sats \ 2 replies \ @TheWildHustle 9h
Might be better to be hit straight on
reply
35 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 8h
and be the first city to get hit
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheWildHustle 8h
Take it on the chest. Jump into the thing, screaming something about freedom or whatnot.
reply
12 sats \ 0 replies \ @justin_shocknet 8h
Probably why underground bunkers and nuclear powered submarines fetch a premium
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @Cje95 6h
I’m just sayin if they start firing them I will be happy to be in DC cause imma be vaporized ASAP and won’t have to deal with any uncertainty or drama 🤷🏼♂️
reply
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @JesseJames 7h
No one will be using nukes anytime soon, get over this, this is a suicide and they all know it. They rattle (or attempt to) some cages just to be heard. The world is over if even half of this is remotely true. Period.
Ain't happening.... IMHO.
reply
18 sats \ 1 reply \ @cascdr 7h
@k00b is Nick posting.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 6h
Nick is contagious.
reply
14 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 7h
reply
35 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 7h
reply
64 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coyote_Cosmico 3h
reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 8h
What about Alaska and Hawaii?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 6h
I suspect they're fucked like everything else.
reply
19 sats \ 0 replies \ @7e6e393a56 9h
Unfortunately, the reality is that countries that have nuclear power have more autonomy in their decisions and are unlikely to be directly harassed... we have an example of this happening today with Russia
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @jddska 22m
What would be the targets in Europe? I saw some map of countries targeted by Russia, but would like to see cities and military basis, as the USA the colonizer of Europe has many bases there.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @jddska 24m
I think its power is very overestimated, nukes cannot destroy taht much and be used in that number. Now they are more powerfull than hiroshima and nagasaki times, but search for some documentaries of people that survived both, some of them were like 2-3km away and nothing happened to them, imedialitely or long time because of radiation. States always try to figure it as total and complete destruction and that after it there's killer radiation everywhere.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Thwachi 1h
Nice post
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @BlokchainB 4h
Ahh yes South Dakota!! Spared! Shocked to see Montana and North Dakota get hammered
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Enemy_of_the_state 4h
Lots of missiles in NoDak and Montana, since they are closest to most targets in Russia. That’s why they are targets.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satoshi__Nakamoto 6h
Seems really bad lots of nuce
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 7h
Isn’t it rich? The only sane one in this whole matter appears to be NOT our man, Vlad Putin!!! While the NATO creeps just cannot keep from swinging their dicks around at everybody else! When did dementia, insanity and psychopathy become the standard for leaders in the West?
Can’t wait to see something different. Pulling out of NATO and the UN would be great.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nitter 10h bot
https://xcancel.com/Rainmaker1973/status/1859199980264710247
reply