pull down to refresh
1337 sats \ 7 replies \ @DarthCoin 5 Oct 2022 \ parent \ on: Is there a way to connect lightning websites? bitcoin
And what is wrong with having few sats in a custodial LN wallet like SN?
Is not KYC,. so who cares?
Custodial LN wallets that are not KYC, are just fine.
Custodial wallet for small things are useful. Don't be so obsessed with "everything non-custodial".
Some aspects could NOT be done in a non-custodial wallet.
I use SN wallet EXCLUSIVELY for use inside SN, sats I received here, I use them to tip and post more. I do NOT depend on these sats in real life to be so obsessed to withdraw them or be afraid that someday I will not be able to use them anymore.
Get used to spread your sats stash in categories.
I understand your sentiment, however, the problem is when we think in custodial terms as the best solution for everything.
You have less than a penny on SN (I'd assume) and that makes the most sense for any person using this website, but if any perception were to be had that paying out of your SN wallet was more coinvent than Alby, and integrates everywhere, we would have completely lost the plot. This would encourage large amounts of Bitcoin being stored on SN for website payments completely unrelated to SN and that was the nature of OPs question.
If we ever get to that point, I would in fact dare to ask what the hell the point of Bitcoin is when custodial solutions for gold exist just as well.
reply
As an example, https://satsoverflow.io asks you to pay a few sats to ask a question, that's a perfect time to use SN wallet to pay for that.
reply
OMG is custodial!! Are you nuts? The world is going to end if you use a custodial wallet.
ššš
reply
You want your custodial wallet, take a custodial wallet:
https://glintpay.com/en_us/
The Bitcoin revolution IS self custody
reply
You don't understand... You have much to learn.
reply
No I do understand, sloth is a very straightforward thing to understand.
reply
That's the whole point.
A few sats are fine to move around the web doing their thing...
I don't care if they're custodial or not.
reply